Bringing the Wood

Every great tennis player has over the course of their career, found a tormentor.  A rival who occasionally stands in the path of greatness, history or success.  Edberg had Becker.  Sampras had Agassi.  Federer has had Nadal for much of his career, and Nadal in turn has had Djokovic.  With Stanilas Wawrinka’s victory over Novak Djokovic in Sunday’s final, it is clear that he is established himself as Novak Djokovic’s tormentor in chief.

This probably won’t come as a surprise to the avid tennis analyst.  Since a certain Australian Open five setter in 2012, Wawrinka and Djokovic have played some brilliant matches at the Grand Slam level.  Novak famously won that match with a backhand passing shot that was befitting of the match’s extraordinarily high shot making standards.  However, Wawrinka was just getting warmed up.  Famous for being a headcase, the rest of the world thought they’d seen – as is the case with one Gael Monfils – a glimpse of what could have been.  Little did we know, that we were witnessing a foreboding of what was to come.

Fast forward over four years later, and Wawrinka is a three time major champion – the same number Andy Murray has.  He’s beaten the current world number #1 to win each of his majors and he has defeated Novak Djokovic en-route to each title.  The most painful of those defeats probably came last year.  Wawrinka was not only the difference between Djokovic and career grand slam (that was finally achieved this year), but he was also the difference between Djokovic and a calendar slam. It is hard to imagine Djokovic producing a season like 2015 again.  While Djokovic has a sizable head to head against the Swiss, it is when those defeats have come, that matter.

wawrinka_backhandIf you are wondering what makes Stan so deadly against Djokovic, yesterday’s match has all the answers.  Djokovic started this match, dialed in.  He was hitting crisply off of both wings and playing well within the supreme abilities of his famed transition game.  That form took him to a 5 – 2 first set lead.  I remember watching the match unfold and getting a sense that I was waiting for something to happen.  I didn’t have to wait too long.  Wawrinka, who had been misfiring early on, suddenly found his range.  In the blink of an eye, it was five all and even though Djokovic was able to grind his way to and successfully through a first set tie break, I knew that Wawrinka had the match on his racket.  He always has.

This U.S Open has been a bit of a resurgence ground for attacking tennis and it was only fitting that it would be on full display again in the finals.  By the time the second Set rolled around, it was clear that this could very well be Circa French Open 2015, all over again.  Wawrinka brings an unbelievable amount of power and weight to a rally.  When he is in the mood, his shots can look and apparently feel like miniature spherical juggernauts.  They can’t be stopped.  That has to be demoralizing, even to a player with the caliber of defensive skills that Djokovic possesses.  What Wawrinka does with his ground strokes, feels eerily similar to what Sampras used to do with his serve.  They both take the racket out of the opponent’s hand, and they do it consistently.  By the final set, that consistent pressure had visibly taken its toll on Djokovic.  Medical timeouts aside, Wawrinka’s firepower had taken a psychological toll on Djokovic.  His shoulders slumped.  He wore defeatist facial expressions and laughed nonchalantly at the flurry of winners that flew by him.  This was Circa French Open 2015.  The Serbinator was being humbled, again.

wawrinka_fingerThe biggest difference between the Wawrinka we see today, and the Wawrinka of old has been the lack of fear he shows.  He admitted to being nervous before the match.  That translated to a slow start, but I don’t think he was afraid.  For a man who has failed and failed better so many times before, he now knows how to access the full repertoire of his game in order to succeed.  As the match slowly wore on, it was Djokovic who looked like a defeated great struggling to find answers.  The more he looked, the less he found and the more panicked he appeared.  That’s new territory for the Serb these days.  There’s a reservoir he cannot access anymore and I wonder if it left him the moment he accomplished the career long dream of winning the French Open.  I thought the desire would resurface during the Olympics, but it didn’t and let’s face it, this U.S Open was not filled with Djokovic running the table.  He experienced a bizarre run of opponent retirements and withdrawals.  His semi-final opponent?  A semi interested Monfils.  That might have affected his form going into a final against an opponent like Wawrinka.  Maybe.  However that wasn’t the situation at Wimbledon.

When he is in the mood, his shots can look and apparently feel like miniature spherical juggernauts.  They can’t be stopped.

For Wawrinka, it is another achievement notched up and added to the career belt.  He has now won the Australian Open, The French Open, and The U.S Open in that order.  Considering that he has been as far as the Semis, victory at the All England Club, remains a possibility.  As for Djokovic, he enters the final months of the season with a lot of questions surrounding him.  For a man who has defined his career by setting goals and targets, what becomes his target now?  Catching Nadal/Sampras?  Catching Federer?  Djokovic has always been a player who needs to define why he should bring his best to the table.  It might be time for him to do so again.



7 replies »

  1. One statistics stand out- break point conversion. Djokovic converted 3 out of 17 and
    Wawrinka 6 out of 10. Djokovic played timidly on breakpoints. Wawrinka had so many
    0-40 games and managed to hold the serve. Djokovic couldn’t put second serve in play
    on breakpoints, hit out or into the net. Djokovic serve was off. He put in 51% first serve,
    much lower than his average. This explains his defeat. It doesn’t signify Wawrinka’s mastery
    over Djokovic. Having not played full six matches enroute to the final, Djokovic didn’t have
    the match toughness. Wawrinka toughed out 3 matches before the final. His timing was
    good, Djokovic’s was somewhat off.

    • In essence Wawrinka was the better player on the day. I still do maintain that there is a sense of ‘mastery’. He’s beaten Djokovic en-route to every slam. Djokovic wasn’t ‘off’ on all three occasions. If you say he was, then you indirectly imply that Wawrinka is the ultimate opportunist. But that can’t be true. Remember, Djokovic has a mastery over Federer. He took him out in all their Grand Slam encounters from 2014 to 2015. He wasn’t always ‘on’ in all those matches. Just something to consider. Thanks for the insights 🙂

    • Many a tennis professional can win a big game when they are not at their best. That is what makes them top players.
      The problem here is that Djoker is almost…”scared” of Stan. I used scared in quotes as I cannot think of a better word.
      Remember, Djoker KNOWS Stan typically always take their matches to 5 setters up until recently. This is no different especially if you think of their h2h in Majors only since 2013.

      “It doesn’t signify Wawrinka’s mastery over Djokovic. ”
      Maybe not, however, Stan is arguably the only player that can take on Djoker in a final for the past 2-3 years or so. (Except on grass)
      Stan is becoming to Djoker what Nadal is to Fed.
      Plain and simple.

      “Having not played full six matches enroute to the final, Djokovic didn’t have the match toughness. ”
      You conveniently ignore the fact the Stan played almost double of that of Nole and is tired and sore. Nole on other hand have got a fully rested body.
      Stan also had to fight Nishikori, Delpo, Evans and Verdasco.

      “Wawrinka toughed out 3 matches before the final.”
      Only? Nishikori, Delpo, Evans and Verdasco gave him an uphill battle.

      “His timing was good, Djokovic’s was somewhat off.”
      Stan’s presence and shots could have made Nole’s shots be off. Another hint at Stan’s mastery. Stan never gave him a chance to play his dominating game.
      Also, go watch a match when Federer or Nadal was still winning. The Top 20 guys played like they are rushed, why? The presence of their opponent.
      Stan has the same over Nole, As long as Stan keeps UE and double faults to a minimum he is a serious threat.


      Below I responded to someone on the ATP site. The questions I have is also applicable here…

      “And how did Djokovic make it to go to the final ? How many full games did he played? Only 8h of play versus 17h for Wawrinka.”
      Who’s fault is that?

      If Nole played any of his walkovers he would not have played in the final…if his injury was that severe.

      If Nole was really injured, why play at all if you are not giving your best? Fed did the right thing by healing properly.

      Nole basically chilled his way to the final. Only Janowicz in the 1st round gave him trouble. Monfils was a ghost of himself.

      Stan had to fight Nishikori, Delpo and Novak… Also he had Verdasco which is no easy task.

      After playing 17h, Stan is sore and tired. He said so himself he was in pain in his interviews.

      ***So which player did the most legwork between Stan and Nole?***
      Long story short, Who deserves this title?
      Answer truthfully now.

      • I think that about surmises the build up to the final and the final between those two. Stan’s game pretty much took Novak out of his element. Recently he’s found a way to sustain that level long enough to win against the Serb.

  2. That being said, I will not deny that Nole did not have enough match readiness.
    Then again, he is the best and should rise above that challenge and find his rhythm.
    problem is that Stan does not allow it when he is not producing errors.

    Djokovic’s was not at his best, but Stan did not allow him.

    Awaiting the AO17!

    If Stan makes it deep and stop making his errors, i want to see him and Nole duke it out. With Nole healthy of course.
    I want to see the world best defender do his thing.

    From a Stan fan

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


Tennis Capsule


  • 15,146 hits

Tennis on Twitter

%d bloggers like this: